My Positions in Eschatology

I favor Historical Premillenialism (Chiliasm).  It's a very messy teaching, but is nevertheless taught by Rev. 20.

The nature of John's discussion of the first and second resurrection in ch. 20 of Revelation preclude a symbolic reading and forces the Chiliast view.  

I'm Post-Trib.

Rapture = The Second Coming.  We'll meet Christ in the air, sure, but not to disappear.  We'll descend with him at that same moment to rule on the earth.

Millennial reign is a special reward for the martyrs mentioned in Revelation (Mounce).

666 = Nero Caesar, the final anti-Christ will be in the spirit of Nero, just as John the Baptist was "in the spirit of Elijah."  Perhaps there's some element of double-prophecy in this symbol, in that the final anti-Christ will have some relation to 666.

The Nero Redivivus myth probably stand behind the "who was, who is not, and who will be" sayings.  This is not problematic in light of the symbolic nature of Nero.

Mark of the beast is a spiritual mark.

As Craig Keener says, if it weren't for Revelation 20 I'd be an Amillennialist.

I don't know what I think of a rebuilt temple.  I think the Olivet discourse primarily refers to the fall of Jerusalem in 70 A.D., but double prophecy is possible (compare: "Out of Egypt I called my Son").  There's also vague references elsewhere (Thessalonians?) in the NT about the anti-Christ sitting in the house of God.  I'm somewhat disinclined to accept a rebuilt temple.  

Jesus does, and clearly so, switch to prophecy about the Eschaton within the Olivet Discourse, though much of it is about 70 A.D.

144,000 is symbolic for the multitudes of the entire Church.

There will be a large conversion of Jews at the end (Romans 11).

The four empires of Daniel:  Babylon, Persian-Mede, Macedonian, Roman.  

The rock that destroys the statue = the Church.

Daniel 11 primarily refers to the Seleucids and Ptolemies.  He switches to the Eschaton somewhere later in the chapter.